Jenkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON JESSICA J., Plaintiff, Case No. 3:20-cv-131 vs. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL District Judge Michael J. Newman SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.
ORDER: (1) GRANTING THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (Doc. No. 28); AND (2) AWARDING PLAINTIFF $4,000.00 IN EAJA FEES
This Social Security case is before the Court on the parties’ joint motion for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $4,000.00. Doc. No. 28. The parties do not dispute that all requirements are met for a reasonable award of EAJA fees. Jd. at PageID 2488. Therefore, the Court: (1) GRANTS the parties’ joint motion; and (2) AWARDS Plaintiff EAJA fees in the amount of $4,000.00. Counsel for the parties shall verify whether Plaintiff owes a pre-existing debt to the United States subject to offset, consistent with Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). Ifno such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award directly to Plaintiff's counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment signed by Plaintiff and his counsel. No further matters require review in this case; accordingly, it remains TERMINATED upon the Court’s docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. March 9, 2022 s/ Michael J. Newman Hon. Michael J. Newman United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jenkins v. Commissioner of Social Security (Jenkins v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.