Jenkins v. City of Vallejo

District Court, E.D. California·Decided August 19, 2021·No. 2:19-cv-01896·Unknown

Opinion

1 NOLD LAW MELISSA C. NOLD, Esq. SBN 301378 2 Russo Building 521 Georgia Street 3 Vallejo, California 94590 Telephone: (707)644-4004 4 melissa@noldlaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff 5

6 POINTER & BUELNA, LLP ADANTE D. POINTER, Esq. SBN 236229 7 LAWYERS FOR THE PEOPLE Wells Fargo Center 8 1901 Harrison Street, Suite 1140 9 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510)929-5400 10 apointer@lawyersftp.com

11 Attorney for Plaintiff

12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 DENAYA JENKINS, ) 15 ) No: 2:19-cv-1896 TLN DB Plaintiff, ) 16 ) vs. ) STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 17 ) ORDER PURSUANT TO CIVIL CITY OF VALLEJO, et al. ) LOCAL RULE 141.1 18 ) Defendants. ) 19 ) ) 20 ) ) 21 ) ) 22 ) ) 23 ) ) 24 )

25 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 26 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, 27 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use 1 for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties 2 hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The 3 parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses 4 to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the 5 limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal 6 principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 7 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party 8 seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 9 2. DEFINITIONS 10 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or 11 items under this Order. 12 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, 13 stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil 14 Procedure 26(c), and for which public disclosure is likely to result in particularized harm and violate 15 privacy interests recognized by law. This information may include: 16 a. personnel file records of any peace officer; 17 b. medical records; 18 c. social security numbers and similar sensitive identifying information (unless 19 redacted by order, Local Rule or by agreement of all parties). 20 d. Videos of subject incident which include non-parties. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their 2 support staff). 3 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces 4 in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 5 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or 6 manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to 7 discovery in this matter. 8 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the 9 litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 10 consultant in this action. 11 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House Counsel does 12 not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 13 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not 14 named as a Party to this action. 15 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action but are 16 retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on behalf of that 17 party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 18 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, 19 retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 20 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this 21 action. 22 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., 23 photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, 24 or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 25 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 26 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 27 1 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing 2 Party. 3 3. SCOPE 4 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as 5 defined above), but also (1) any information copied from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, 6 summaries, or compilations of Protected Material that reveal the source of the Protected Material or that reveal specific information entitled to confidentiality as a matter of law; and (3) any testimony, 7 conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 8 However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following 9 information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving 10 Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of 11 publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record 12 through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the 13 disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the 14 information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. ; (c) any 15 information mentioned or referenced in a deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, unless 16 such portions of testimony have been designated as confidential pursuant to section 5.2 (b) of this 17 order. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 18 4. DURATION 19 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 20 Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 21 otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and 22 defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion 23 and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the time 24 limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 25 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 26 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or Non-Party 27 that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to limit any such 1 designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party 2 must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written 3 communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or 4 communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of 5 this Order. 6 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins v. City of Vallejo, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Jenkins v. City of Vallejo (Jenkins v. City of Vallejo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)