Jenkins v. Bureau of Land Management Supervisors

Opinion

MITCHELL JENKINS, Case No.: 2:24-cv-01925-APG-NJK 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 15] BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT SUPERVISORS, et al., 7 Defendants 8 9 On May 21, 2025, Magistrate Judge Koppe recommended that I dismiss plaintiff Mitchell 10]] Jenkins’ second amended complaint without prejudice. ECF No. 15. Jenkins did not object. 11} Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 12/U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made’’); United States v. 14]| Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the 15]| magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Koppe’s report and recommendation 18] (ECF No. 15) is accepted, plaintiff Mitchell Jenkins’ second amended complaint (ECF No. 14) is 19]| dismissed, and the clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 20 DATED this 11th day of June, 2025. 21 22 —_ ANDREW P. GORDON 3 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE