Jenkins v. Bloodgood

22 Wend. 645
New York Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 1840·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Bronson, J.

The order to stay proceedings did" not give the defendant the same time to plead after the -motion to consolidate was decided, that he had at the time the order was served. Brown v. St. John, 19 Wendell, 617. And the 20 days for pleading having expired before the motion was made, the plaintiff was at liberty to enter the default as soon as the order to stay proceedings ceased to operate. The defendant might have- pleaded before the motion was made. The plaintiff was regular, and as there is no affidavit of merits, the default must stand.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins v. Bloodgood, 22 Wend. 645 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1840).

22 Wend. 645 (Jenkins v. Bloodgood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rankans v. Circuit Judge
1 McGrath 683 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1893)