Jenkins v. Artuz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jenkins v. Artuz

159 A.D.2d 625, 553 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2957

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 159 A.D.2d 625 (Jenkins v. Artuz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jenkins v. Artuz, 159 A.D.2d 625, 553 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2957 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination dated July 10, 1986, which, after a Superintendent’s hearing, found the petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule and which imposed a penalty, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Rosenblatt, J.), entered February 17, 1987, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner failed to effect personal service of the notice of petition on the respondents and the New York State Attorney-General (CPLR 403 [c]; 307 [1]) and similarly failed to move for leave to effect a substituted method of service (CPLR 308 [5]; 7804 [c]). The failure of the petitioner to acquire personal jurisdiction over the respondents is a fatal defect precluding further action by this court (see, Macchia v Russo, 67 NY2d 592). Kunzeman, J. P., Hooper, Sullivan and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination dated July 10, 1986, which, after a Superintendent’s hearing, found the petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule and which imposed a penalty, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Rosenblatt, J.), entered February 17, 1987, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner failed to effect personal service of the notice of petition on the respondents and the New York State Attorney-General (CPLR 403 [c]; 307 [1]) and similarly failed to move for leave to effect a substituted method of service (CPLR 308 [5]; 7804 [c]). The failure of the petitioner to acquire personal jurisdiction over the respondents is a fatal defect precluding further action by this court (see, Macchia v Russo, 67 NY2d 592). Kunzeman, J. P., Hooper, Sullivan and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 A.D.2d 625, 553 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenkins-v-artuz-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack