Jenkins v. American Horse Shows Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jenkins v. American Horse Shows Ass'n

29 A.D.2d 860, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4345

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 28, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 860 (Jenkins v. American Horse Shows Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jenkins v. American Horse Shows Ass'n, 29 A.D.2d 860, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4345 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by respondent, pursuant to CPLR 5701 (subd. [e]) for leave to appeal to this court from an intermediate order in an article 78 proceeding which “remitted the proceeding to respondent in order that a new hearing may be held if deemed advisable”. Under CPLR 5701 (subd. [c]), a motion for leave to appeal to this court must be made to an individual Justice of this court (Matter of Various Tenants of 790 Biverside Drive v. Gabel, 24 A D 2d 848; Matter of 128 Best. v. State Dig. Auth., 24 A D 2d 849; Fish v. Shattueh Derm Mining Corp., 28 A D 2d 992). Accordingly, this motion was referred to Justice Louis J. Capozzoli, an Associate Justice of this court, who granted the motion. Concur — Stevens, J. P., Eager, Steuer, Capozzoli and Tilzer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by respondent, pursuant to CPLR 5701 (subd. [e]) for leave to appeal to this court from an intermediate order in an article 78 proceeding which “remitted the proceeding to respondent in order that a new hearing may be held if deemed advisable”. Under CPLR 5701 (subd. [c]), a motion for leave to appeal to this court must be made to an individual Justice of this court (Matter of Various Tenants of 790 Biverside Drive v. Gabel, 24 A D 2d 848; Matter of 128 Best. v. State Dig. Auth., 24 A D 2d 849; Fish v. Shattueh Derm Mining Corp., 28 A D 2d 992). Accordingly, this motion was referred to Justice Louis J. Capozzoli, an Associate Justice of this court, who granted the motion. Concur — Stevens, J. P., Eager, Steuer, Capozzoli and Tilzer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 860, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenkins-v-american-horse-shows-assn-nyappdiv-1968.