Jenkins v. 511 West 235th Street Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jenkins v. 511 West 235th Street Associates

213 A.D.2d 700, 624 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3601

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 29, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 213 A.D.2d 700 (Jenkins v. 511 West 235th Street Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jenkins v. 511 West 235th Street Associates, 213 A.D.2d 700, 624 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3601 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated February 24, 1994, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant failed to make a prima facie showing of its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (cf., Eddy v Tops Friendly Mkts., 91 AD2d 1203). Therefore, the court correctly denied its motion for summary judgment (see, Canosa v Abadir, 165 AD2d 823; Fox v Wyeth Labs., 129 AD2d 611). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Lawrence and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated February 24, 1994, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant failed to make a prima facie showing of its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (cf., Eddy v Tops Friendly Mkts., 91 AD2d 1203). Therefore, the court correctly denied its motion for summary judgment (see, Canosa v Abadir, 165 AD2d 823; Fox v Wyeth Labs., 129 AD2d 611). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Lawrence and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 A.D.2d 700, 624 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenkins-v-511-west-235th-street-associates-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack