Jenkins Metal Shops, Inc. v. Pneumafil Corporation
This text of 427 F.2d 144 (Jenkins Metal Shops, Inc. v. Pneumafil Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon a copious record and after observing the accused machine in operation, the District Judge concluded that the device does not infringe appellant’s patent. We have reviewed the record and are in accord with the Judge’s findings and conclusions. For the reasons stated in the District Court’s opinion, 303 F.Supp. 653 (W.D.N.C.1969), its judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
427 F.2d 144, 166 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 454, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenkins-metal-shops-inc-v-pneumafil-corporation-ca4-1970.