Jenkins Electric v. Mayes
This text of 393 So. 2d 44 (Jenkins Electric v. Mayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the point raised by appellants, finding that claimant’s letter, filed with the Division of Worker’s Compensation, was a sufficient claim to toll the statute of limitations until an amended claim was filed. Because of the concern raised in appellants’ argument, we add that we certainly do not sanction the manner in which appellants were initially notified of the original claim, i. e., by a notice of hearing “on the merits.” However, whatever the procedural deficiencies in this case, they did not operate to make appellee’s original claim invalid.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
393 So. 2d 44, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenkins-electric-v-mayes-fladistctapp-1981.