Jenkins Electric v. Mayes

393 So. 2d 44, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19412
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 27, 1981
DocketNo. VV-398
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 393 So. 2d 44 (Jenkins Electric v. Mayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jenkins Electric v. Mayes, 393 So. 2d 44, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19412 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the point raised by appellants, finding that claimant’s letter, filed with the Division of Worker’s Compensation, was a sufficient claim to toll the statute of limitations until an amended claim was filed. Because of the concern raised in appellants’ argument, we add that we certainly do not sanction the manner in which appellants were initially notified of the original claim, i. e., by a notice of hearing “on the merits.” However, whatever the procedural deficiencies in this case, they did not operate to make appellee’s original claim invalid.

AFFIRMED.

SHIVERS, SHAW and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pitts v. Nimnicht Chevrolet
569 So. 2d 921 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
McKenney v. School Bd. of Palm Beach County
456 So. 2d 524 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
393 So. 2d 44, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenkins-electric-v-mayes-fladistctapp-1981.