Jenkins Bros. v. Carmen

37 S.E. 719, 112 Ga. 476, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 209
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 20, 1900·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Fish, J.

1. An equitable petition to enjoin the cutting of timber is not maintainable under the provisions of section 4927 of the Civil Code, when the plaintiff’s claim of “perfect title ” depends upon' an allegation that he and the defendant hold under a common grantor, as the truth of such an allega^ tion can not, in the nature of things, appear upon the face of the deeds or other instruments constituting the “original titles,” the existence of which must appear from the allegations of the petition and which the plaintiff must produce to the judge, but necessarily rests upon aliunde proof. A case of the nature here indicated falls within the principle laid down in Dixon v. Monroe, 112 Ga. 158, and authorities there cited.

2. Applying what is said above to the facts appearing in the record, the court erred in granting the injunction.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins Bros. v. Carmen, 37 S.E. 719, 112 Ga. 476, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 209 (Ga. 1900).

37 S.E. 719 (Jenkins Bros. v. Carmen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fourth National Bank v. Wilson
101 So. 29 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1924)
Powell v. Brinson
47 S.E. 499 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Gillis v. Hilton & Dodge Lumber Co.
38 S.E. 940 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Morgan v. Baxter & Co.
38 S.E. 411 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)