Jenkins Bros. v. Carmen

37 S.E. 719, 112 Ga. 476, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 209
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 20, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 37 S.E. 719 (Jenkins Bros. v. Carmen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jenkins Bros. v. Carmen, 37 S.E. 719, 112 Ga. 476, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 209 (Ga. 1900).

Opinion

Fish, J.

1. An equitable petition to enjoin the cutting of timber is not maintainable under the provisions of section 4927 of the Civil Code, when the plaintiff’s claim of “perfect title ” depends upon' an allegation that he and the defendant hold under a common grantor, as the truth of such an allega^ tion can not, in the nature of things, appear upon the face of the deeds or other instruments constituting the “original titles,” the existence of which must appear from the allegations of the petition and which the plaintiff must produce to the judge, but necessarily rests upon aliunde proof. A case of the nature here indicated falls within the principle laid down in Dixon v. Monroe, 112 Ga. 158, and authorities there cited.

2. Applying what is said above to the facts appearing in the record, the court erred in granting the injunction.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fourth National Bank v. Wilson
101 So. 29 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1924)
Powell v. Brinson
47 S.E. 499 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Gillis v. Hilton & Dodge Lumber Co.
38 S.E. 940 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Morgan v. Baxter & Co.
38 S.E. 411 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 S.E. 719, 112 Ga. 476, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenkins-bros-v-carmen-ga-1900.