Jenis Walter Branch v. Edward Murray
This text of 74 F.3d 1230 (Jenis Walter Branch v. Edward Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
74 F.3d 1230
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jenis Walter BRANCH, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward MURRAY, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 95-7587.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided Jan. 24, 1996.
Jenis Walter Branch, Appellant Pro Se.
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from the order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) habeas petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Branch v. Murray, No. CA-94-77-AM (E.D.Va. Sept. 18, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 F.3d 1230, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39010, 1996 WL 24662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenis-walter-branch-v-edward-murray-ca4-1996.