Jenericah Kibe v. Loretta E. Lynch
This text of 641 F. App'x 681 (Jenericah Kibe v. Loretta E. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After an immigration judge denied Kenyan citizen Jenericah Mugure Kibe asylum, withholding of removal, adjustment of status, and other asylum relief, she moved to reopen the proceedings in order to apply for adjustment of status based on a third alien-relative visa petition filed by her United States citizen husband. The immigration judge denied the motion, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissed Ms. Kibe’s ensuing appeal, and Ms. Kibe now petitions for review of the BIA’s order. After careful review, we conclude that the BIA acted within its discretion in dismissing the appeal. See Martinez v. Lynch, 785 F.3d 1262, 1264-65 (8th Cir.2015) (standard of review); Miah v. Mukasey, 519 F.3d 784, 789-90, (8th Cir.2008) (BIA did not abuse discretion in denying motion to reopen based on, inter alia, insufficient evidence of bona fides of alien’s marriage and timing of marriage).
Accordingly* we deny the petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
641 F. App'x 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenericah-kibe-v-loretta-e-lynch-ca8-2016.