Jencks v. Saalfield

11 Misc. 709
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedJanuary 15, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 11 Misc. 709 (Jencks v. Saalfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jencks v. Saalfield, 11 Misc. 709 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Present: Freedman and Gildersleeve, JJ.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Misc. 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jencks-v-saalfield-nysuperctnyc-1895.