Jemzura v. Mugglin

647 N.E.2d 451, 84 N.Y.2d 1025, 623 N.Y.S.2d 179, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 84
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 17, 1995
StatusPublished

This text of 647 N.E.2d 451 (Jemzura v. Mugglin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jemzura v. Mugglin, 647 N.E.2d 451, 84 N.Y.2d 1025, 623 N.Y.S.2d 179, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 84 (N.Y. 1995).

Opinion

Motion for reconsideration of December 1, 1994 order of dismissal, insofar as it is made by George Jemzura purportedly on behalf of Raymond Jemzura, dismissed upon the ground that George Jemzura is not Raymond Jemzura’s authorized legal representative; motion for reconsideration otherwise denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic. [See, 84 NY2d 977.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sharrow v. Dick Corp.
647 N.E.2d 110 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
647 N.E.2d 451, 84 N.Y.2d 1025, 623 N.Y.S.2d 179, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jemzura-v-mugglin-ny-1995.