Jemsek v. North Carolina Medical Board

697 F. App'x 234
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 22, 2017
DocketNo. 17-1307
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 697 F. App'x 234 (Jemsek v. North Carolina Medical Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jemsek v. North Carolina Medical Board, 697 F. App'x 234 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

This case is Joseph Jemsek’s third attempt to have a court undo disciplinary actions taken against him by the North Carolina Medical Board (“NCMB”) in 2006 and 2008. See Jemsek v. Rhyne, 662 Fed.Appx. 206, 208-09 (4th Cir. 2016) (No. 15-1420). Jemsek appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint on the grounds that his antitrust claims were barred by the Eleventh Amendment and he lacked standing to raise claims against the former NCMB members and the current NCMB members in their individual capacities, and denying Jemsek leave to file a second amended complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jemsek v. N.C. Med. Bd., No. 5:16-cv-00059-D, 2017 WL 696721 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 21, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dingle v. Baggett
E.D. North Carolina, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
697 F. App'x 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jemsek-v-north-carolina-medical-board-ca4-2017.