JEM Realty Co. v. Town Board of the Town of Southold

297 A.D.2d 278, 746 N.Y.2d 41, 746 N.Y.S.2d 41, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7790
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 5, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 297 A.D.2d 278 (JEM Realty Co. v. Town Board of the Town of Southold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
JEM Realty Co. v. Town Board of the Town of Southold, 297 A.D.2d 278, 746 N.Y.2d 41, 746 N.Y.S.2d 41, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

[279]*279The rezoning resolutions adopted on December 7, 1993, and July 26, 1994, were ineffective to amend the changes to the Zoning Code of the Town of Southold which were enacted by Local Law No. 1 in 1989 (Local Law No. 1 [1989] of Town of Southold). The doctrine of legislative equivalency requires that existing legislation be amended or repealed by the same procedure as was used to enact it (see Naftal Assoc. v Town of Brookhaven, 221 AD2d 423; Noghrey v Town of Brookhaven, 214 AD2d 659). The procedure for the passage of the resolutions in question failed to comply with the requirements for the passage of a local law. As a result, the motion of the Town Board of the Town of Southold (hereinafter the Town) for summary judgment should have been granted on the ground of legislative equivalency, and a judgment should have been entered declaring that the December 7, 1993, and July 26, 1994, rezoning resolutions were invalid.

We reject the argument that 1989 Local Law No. 1 was never properly filed pursuant to Municipal Home Rule Law § 27, and that this alleged procedural misstep is fatal to the Town’s argument. Municipal Home Rule Law § 27 requires that the “text” of the law be filed with the Department of State and the record clearly reveals that this requirement was complied with by the Town. Thus, 1989 Local Law No. 1 was validly enacted.

The remaining contentions of JEM Realty Company are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Feuerstein, Luciano and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Koldin v. City of Schenectady
2025 NY Slip Op 06769 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Matter of Calverton Manor, LLC v. Town of Riverhead
2018 NY Slip Op 2610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 278, 746 N.Y.2d 41, 746 N.Y.S.2d 41, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jem-realty-co-v-town-board-of-the-town-of-southold-nyappdiv-2002.