Jellison v. Jellison

47 A. 612, 70 N.H. 633
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1900·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Peaslee, J.

The question of whether justice required the granting of the motion is not one of law. As justice required that the order be made, and the court had power to make it (P. S., ■c. 176, s. 4), it is immaterial whether the application was called a petition or a motion. The parties were already in court, the libel-ant was given an opportunity to be heard, and if a further hearing is needed it can be had upon application.

Exception overruled.

Young, J., did not sit: Chase, J., dissented: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jellison v. Jellison, 47 A. 612, 70 N.H. 633 (N.H. 1900).

47 A. 612 (Jellison v. Jellison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coffin v. Coffin
124 A. 461 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1924)