Jellico v. Bailie

Supreme Court of Georgia

Jellico v. Bailie

66 S.E. 916, 133 Ga. 737, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 43

DecidedJanuary 12, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 66 S.E. 916 (Jellico v. Bailie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jellico v. Bailie, 66 S.E. 916, 133 Ga. 737, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 43 (Ga. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

After the return of this case to the trial court under a former exemption (130 Ga. 447 (60 S. E. 998)), there was a reference to the auditor, a report, and exceptions of fact hy each party to different findings of fact. The jury to which they were submitted sustained the auditor’s report. The plaintiff moved for a new trial. It was refused, and' he excepted. Held, that, as to the findings of fact to which the plaintiff filed specific exceptions, the evidence warranted the verdict; and that, taking them in connection with the other findings of the auditor to which he filed no exceptions, the verdict of the jury was supported by the evidence, and there was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial, which was based on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to law, the evidence, and certain charges of the court.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lumpkin, J.

After the return of this case to the trial court under a former exemption (130 Ga. 447 (60 S. E. 998)), there was a reference to the auditor, a report, and exceptions of fact hy each party to different findings of fact. The jury to which they were submitted sustained the auditor’s report. The plaintiff moved for a new trial. It was refused, and' he excepted. Held, that, as to the findings of fact to which the plaintiff filed specific exceptions, the evidence warranted the verdict; and that, taking them in connection with the other findings of the auditor to which he filed no exceptions, the verdict of the jury was supported by the evidence, and there was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial, which was based on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to law, the evidence, and certain charges of the court.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 S.E. 916, 133 Ga. 737, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jellico-v-bailie-ga-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack