Jellal v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jellal v. Brown

37 A.D.3d 179, 830 N.Y.S.2d 510

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 6, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 37 A.D.3d 179 (Jellal v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jellal v. Brown, 37 A.D.3d 179, 830 N.Y.S.2d 510 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered January 9, 2006, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant Althea Brown testified that upon seeing the infant plaintiff, who had no memory of the incident, she hit her brakes, blew her horn, and stopped the vehicle. It was also unrefuted that the infant plaintiff left the safety of the sidewalk, attempted to cross the roadway not at the crosswalk, and moved into the path of the vehicle. Under such circumstances, defendants were entitled to summary dismissal (see Sae Hyun Kim v Mirisis, 286 AD2d 761 [2001]; Johnson v Lovett, 285 AD2d 627 [2001]; Miller v Sisters of Order of St. Dominic, 262 AD2d 373 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 763 [2000]). Concur—Andrias, J.E, Marlow, Williams, Buckley and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered January 9, 2006, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant Althea Brown testified that upon seeing the infant plaintiff, who had no memory of the incident, she hit her brakes, blew her horn, and stopped the vehicle. It was also unrefuted that the infant plaintiff left the safety of the sidewalk, attempted to cross the roadway not at the crosswalk, and moved into the path of the vehicle. Under such circumstances, defendants were entitled to summary dismissal (see Sae Hyun Kim v Mirisis, 286 AD2d 761 [2001]; Johnson v Lovett, 285 AD2d 627 [2001]; Miller v Sisters of Order of St. Dominic, 262 AD2d 373 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 763 [2000]). Concur—Andrias, J.E, Marlow, Williams, Buckley and Malone, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.3d 179, 830 N.Y.S.2d 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jellal-v-brown-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack