Jelks v. Wesleyan Female College

96 S.E. 343, 22 Ga. App. 465, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 556
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 9, 1918
Docket9174
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 96 S.E. 343 (Jelks v. Wesleyan Female College) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jelks v. Wesleyan Female College, 96 S.E. 343, 22 Ga. App. 465, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 556 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the plea.

2. The plea having been stricken, the paragraphs of the petition were left undenied; and as they were properly.paragraphed and the averments therein were “distinctly and plainly made,” it was not necessary to submit proof of them. Civil Code (1910), §§ 5538, 5539, 5662; Jester v. Bainbridge State Bank, 4 Ga. App. 469 (5), 475 (61 S. E. 926); Ney v. Clere Clothing Co., 5 Ga. App. 325 (2) (63 S. E. 143); Methodist Episcopal Church v. Dudley Sash &c. Co., 137 Ga. 68 (4), 69 (72 S. E. 480).

3. The defendant’s plea having been stricken, the case was in default, and judgment was properly rendered at the first term. The act creating thé city court of Macon expressly provides for this. See Ga. Laws 1900, p. 144, sec. 4.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur. The defendant demurred generally and specially to the plea, and the court sustained the general demurrer and struck the plea. W. D. McNeil, for plaintiff in error, cited:

Brobston v. Penniman, 91 Ga. 527 (2); Morris v. Georgia Loan Co., 109 Ga. 12 (2); Fouche v. Merchants Nat. Bank, 110 Ga. 827 (3); Bank of St. Marys v. Mumford, 6 Ga. 44; Sutton v. Aiken, 62 Ga. 734; Mercer v. Morgan, 136 Ga. 632; Veal v. Hurt, 63 Ga. 728; Freeman v. Mut. Bldg. Asso., 90 Ga. 190; Lewis v. Howell, 98 Ga. 428; Chastain v. Peak, 111 Ga. 889.

Hardeman, Jones, Park & Johnston, Harry S. Sirozier, contra, cited:

Park’s Code, §§ 5538-9, 5662; Fowler v. Rome Dispensary, 5 Ga. App. 36 (5); Bedingfield v. Bates Adv. Co., 2 Ga. App. 107; A. C. L. R. Co. v. Hart L. Co., 2 Ga. App. 88 (3); Thomas v. Siesel, 2 Ga. App. 663; Levy v. Bixler Co., 20 Ga. App. 766; Sloan v. Bank, 20 Ga. App. 123; Rood v. Wright, 124 Ga. 849; Third N. Bank v. Poe, 5 Ga. App. 114 (1b); Johnson v. Leffler Co., 122 Ga. 670; 9 R. C. L. 722; Carswell v. Hartridge, 55 Ga. 412; Park’s Code, § 4242; Ga. L. 1900, p. 144, sec. 4; Ney v. Clere Clo. Co., 5 Ga. App. 325.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pape v. Woolford Realty Co.
134 S.E. 174 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 S.E. 343, 22 Ga. App. 465, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jelks-v-wesleyan-female-college-gactapp-1918.