Jelks v. St. Mary's Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jelks v. St. Mary's Hospital

131 A.D.3d 670, 15 N.Y.S.3d 700

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 26, 2015

Docket2013-10054

StatusPublished

This text of 131 A.D.3d 670 (Jelks v. St. Mary's Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jelks v. St. Mary's Hospital, 131 A.D.3d 670, 15 N.Y.S.3d 700 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, etc., the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Silber, J.), dated April 21, 2010, which, among other things, denied his motion for leave to amend the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

It is the obligation of the appellant to assemble a proper record on appeal (see 425 E. 26th St. Owners Corp. v Beaton, 128 AD3d 766 [2015]). Here, the record filed by the appellant is inadequate to enable this Court to render an informed decision on the merits regarding the appeal and, accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed (see Elgart v Berezovsky, 123 AD3d 970 [2014]).

Mastro, J.R, Leventhal, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, etc., the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Silber, J.), dated April 21, 2010, which, among other things, denied his motion for leave to amend the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

It is the obligation of the appellant to assemble a proper record on appeal (see 425 E. 26th St. Owners Corp. v Beaton, 128 AD3d 766 [2015]). Here, the record filed by the appellant is inadequate to enable this Court to render an informed decision on the merits regarding the appeal and, accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed (see Elgart v Berezovsky, 123 AD3d 970 [2014]).

Mastro, J.R, Leventhal, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 A.D.3d 670, 15 N.Y.S.3d 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jelks-v-st-marys-hospital-nyappdiv-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack