Jeffs, F. v. Overmyer, M.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
FRANK JEFFS, : No. 29 EM 2019 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : MR. M.D. OVERMYER, : SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI FOREST : FOR DOC, DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S : OFFICE, FOR PHILADELPHIA, PA AND : ATTORNEY GENERAL, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 2019, the “Motion for Leave of Court to File
Original Application of Writ of Habeas Corpus,” to the extent that it seeks leave to file
original process, is GRANTED. In all other respects, the “Motion for Leave of Court to
File Original Application of Writ of Habeas Corpus” is DENIED.
The “Motion for Appointment of Counsel,” the “Grounds for Granting Petitioner
ROR Bail,” the “Motion for Judgment Granting Writ of Habeas Corpus,” the “Motion for
Leave of Court to File Supplemental Motion for Judgment for Granting Writ of Habeas
Corpus,” the “Motion to Vacate Order of May 28, 2019 and Motion to Strike Respondent’s
Nunc Pro Tunc Letters of No Response,” the “Motion for Evidentiary Hearing and
Appointment of Counsel,” and the “Motion for Default Judgment for Failure to Contest the
Merits Considered Admission of Guilt” are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jeffs, F. v. Overmyer, M. (Jeffs, F. v. Overmyer, M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.