Jeffries v. Ross

238 A.D.2d 288, 657 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4283
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 29, 1997·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered on April 23, 1996, which denied petitioner’s application to stay arbitration and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Petitioner’s contention that there was not a valid agreement to arbitrate due to the fact that the contract as a whole was allegedly vague and therefore unenforceable is without merit (see, Matter of Prime [Jonas], 38 NY2d 570, 576-577). Since the parties’ intent to arbitrate "[a]ny dispute” under the agreement was clear and unequivocal, and since respondent’s claim falls within the scope of the arbitration clause, petitioner’s application was properly denied (see, Sisters of St. John the Baptist v Geraghty Constructor, 67 NY2d 997, 998). Concur— Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jeffries v. Ross, 238 A.D.2d 288, 657 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4283 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

238 A.D.2d 288 (Jeffries v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cooper v. Bruckner
21 A.D.3d 758 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Denney v. BDO Seidman, L.L.P.
412 F.3d 58 (Second Circuit, 2005)
Wagner Acquisition Corp. v. Giove
250 A.D.2d 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)