Jeffries v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 09-JAN-2025 02:05 PM Dkt. 47 ODMR
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________
DONALD JEFFRIES, Petitioner,
vs.
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Respondent. ________________________________________________________________
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)
Upon consideration of Petitioner’s letter filed on January 6, 2025, which we construe as a motion for reconsideration of this court’s order filed on January 2, 2025, and the record, this court has not overlooked or misapprehended points of law or fact. See Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(b) (eff. 2000). It is ordered that the motion is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, January 9, 2025.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza /s/ Vladimir P. Devens
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jeffries v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel (Jeffries v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.