Jeffreys v. . Yarborough

9 N.C. 307
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 5, 1822
StatusPublished

This text of 9 N.C. 307 (Jeffreys v. . Yarborough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jeffreys v. . Yarborough, 9 N.C. 307 (N.C. 1822).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Where a Master reports that, any-specified sum is admitted by the parties to be due, it ought, in general, to be presumed, prima facie, to be true, and to throw the onus on- the, other side to shew' the contrary by affidavit. But even in such case, the more regular, and certainly the safer way, is, for the party-making the admission, to sign it in the Master’s presence- — (3 P. Wms. 142—Cursus Canc ellarioe 427.) In this case, however, the report shews upon its face, that the sums reported were raised by the Master from accounts exhibited by the party, the items of which accounts were admitted ; and such a report is clearly irregular unless the accounts accompany the report, or are particularly referred to, so that the Court may examine the correctness of the Master’s inferences.

The report must therefore he. set aside, and the cause .remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 N.C. 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffreys-v-yarborough-nc-1822.