Jeffreys v. . Alston

4 N.C. 438
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJuly 5, 1816
StatusPublished

This text of 4 N.C. 438 (Jeffreys v. . Alston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jeffreys v. . Alston, 4 N.C. 438 (N.C. 1816).

Opinion

This was a petition to the county court of FRANKLIN to set aside the probate of William Jeffrey's will and reexamine the same for the several grounds mentioned in the petition.

The practice in cases of this kind has been settled by this Court inMoss v. Vincent, ante, 298. An affidavit must be annexed to the petition "verifying the facts on which it is sought to set aside the probate of a will." It appears that the accompanying document, alleged by the petitioners to be an affidavit, was sworn to before William Boylan, Esq., one of the justices of the peace in and for the county of Wake. We are all of opinion that the deponents could not be convicted of perjury, provided the contents of said document were false, as the justice of Wake *Page 330 County had no legal authority to administer an oath to any person to prove the contents of an affidavit which was to be made use of in the county court of Franklin.

The Court are of opinion that as this petition stands without any accompanying affidavit, it must be dismissed.

Cited: Redmond v. Collins, 15 N.C. 439; Armstrong v. Baker, 31 N.C. 112;Randolph v. Hughes, 89 N.C. 430.

(439)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Randolph v. . Hughes
89 N.C. 428 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1883)
Redmond v. . Collins
15 N.C. 430 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1834)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 N.C. 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffreys-v-alston-nc-1816.