Jeffrey Workman v. Superintendent Albion SCI

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jeffrey Workman v. Superintendent Albion SCI. Read the opinion of the Court — 915 F.3d 928
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided October 30, 2018·No. 16-1969·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 16-1969

JEFFREY WORKMAN, Appellant

v.

SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI; DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA; ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA

(E. D. Pa. No.2-14-cv-02957)

SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

Present: AMBRO, RESTREPO, and FUENTES, Circuit Judges

The petition for rehearing filed by appellees in the above-entitled case

having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court, it is

hereby O R D E R E D that the petition for rehearing by the panel is granted. The

opinion and judgment entered September 11, 2018 are hereby

V A C A T E D.1 A subsequent opinion and judgment will be issued.

1As the merits panel has vacated the prior opinion and judgment, action is not required by the en banc court. BY THE COURT,

s/ Julio M. Fuentes Circuit Judge

Dated: October 30, 2018 CJG/cc: Marshall L. Dayan, Esq. Lisa B. Freeland, Esq. Susan E. Affronti, Esq. Catherine B. Kiefer, Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jeffrey Workman v. Superintendent Albion SCI, (3d Cir. 2018).

Jeffrey Workman v. Superintendent Albion SCI (Jeffrey Workman v. Superintendent Albion SCI) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.