Jeffrey "Tre" Krueger, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of CRU Energy, Inc. v. Michael S. Torres

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 22, 2016
Docket03-15-00721-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Jeffrey "Tre" Krueger, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of CRU Energy, Inc. v. Michael S. Torres (Jeffrey "Tre" Krueger, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of CRU Energy, Inc. v. Michael S. Torres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jeffrey "Tre" Krueger, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of CRU Energy, Inc. v. Michael S. Torres, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00721-CV

Jeffrey “Tre” Krueger, Individually and derivatively on behalf of CRU Energy, Inc., Appellant

v.

Michael S. Torres, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 201ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-11-001680, HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The appellate record must include the clerk’s record from the trial court.1 The clerk’s

record in this cause was due in this Court on January 19, 2016, but no record was filed. We received

notice from the Travis County district clerk’s office on January 19, 2016, that appellant had neither

paid for nor designated the record. Nor had appellant filed an affidavit of indigence.2

Under these circumstances, this Court may dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution.3 Despite repeated subsequent advisories and requests from this Court that appellant

make payment arrangements for the record or risk dismissal, and contrary to a letter from

appellant representing that he had done so, the Travis County district clerk’s office has advised us

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 34.1, 34.5(a). 2 See id. R. 20.1. 3 See id. R. 37.3(b). on June 14, 2016, that appellant has neither paid for nor made a designation of the record. We

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.4

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Bourland

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: June 22, 2016

4 See id. R. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jeffrey "Tre" Krueger, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of CRU Energy, Inc. v. Michael S. Torres, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffrey-tre-krueger-individually-and-derivatively-on-behalf-of-cru-texapp-2016.