Jeffrey Tad Fletcher v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 9, 2009
Docket06-09-00075-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jeffrey Tad Fletcher v. State (Jeffrey Tad Fletcher v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jeffrey Tad Fletcher v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion



In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana



______________________________



No. 06-09-00075-CR



JEFFREY TAD FLETCHER, Appellant



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee





On Appeal from the 173rd Judicial District Court

Henderson County, Texas

Trial Court No. A-16,693





Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Jeffrey Tad Fletcher filed a notice of appeal (1) March 16, 2009, stating that he "presents his notice of appeal of the Court's rulings on pretrial motions." On our review of the clerk's record, we noted that the certification of Fletcher's right of appeal states that this "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." Further, the plea agreement states, "The Defendant now understanding all rights in this connection, freely, and voluntarily waives and abandons his right to appeal in this cause."

On April 22, 2009, we mailed a letter to appellant's counsel requesting that she show this Court how we had jurisdiction over this appeal, and warning her that, if we did not receive an adequate response within twenty days of the date of the letter, we would dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. It is now June 8, and no response has been received.

Unless a certification showing that a defendant has the right of appeal is in the record, we must dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). Because the trial court's certification affirmatively shows Fletcher has no right of appeal, and because the record before us does not reflect that the certification is incorrect, see Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005), we must dismiss the appeal.

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.



Jack Carter

Justice



Date Submitted: June 8, 2009

Date Decided: June 9, 2009



Do Not Publish

1. Originally appealed to the Twelfth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 73.001 (Vernon 2005). We are unaware of any conflict between precedent of the Twelfth Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 41.3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jeffrey Tad Fletcher v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffrey-tad-fletcher-v-state-texapp-2009.