Jeffrey Raymond Mott, Jr. v. State
This text of Jeffrey Raymond Mott, Jr. v. State (Jeffrey Raymond Mott, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered May 13, 2014
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00237-CR
JEFFREY MOTT, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401-82489-10
ORDER The Court has before it appellant’s May 9, 2014 motion to extend time to file his brief.
We note that counsel filed an Anders brief in this case. The appeal is from appellant’s conviction
following the adjudication of his guilt. Although counsel briefly discusses the original plea
hearing and states that evidence was presented, the reporter’s record of the guilty plea hearing is
not before the Court. Moreover, the record reflects that the conditions of appellant’s community
supervision were modified, but counsel does not discuss the proceedings, if any, at which the
modifications were made. Finally, counsel does not address any motions that were filed by
appellant. Accordingly, we conclude the brief does not satisfy the requirements of Anders and
its progeny. See Jeffery v. State, 903 S.W.2d 776 (Tex. App.––Dallas 1995, no pet.). Accordingly, we DENY the May 9, 2014 extension motion as moot and STRIKE the Anders
brief tendered by counsel.
We ORDER Kim Tinsley, official court reporter of the 401st Judicial District Court, to
file, or coordinate the filing of, the reporter’s record of the July 15, 2011 plea hearing, as well as
the records of any other hearings, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
We ORDER counsel to file, within SIXTY DAYS of the date of this order, either an
amended brief that complies with the requirements of Anders and its progeny or a brief raising
issues on the merits.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Kim
Tinsley, official court reporter, 301st Judicial District Court, and to counsel for all parties.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jeffrey Raymond Mott, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffrey-raymond-mott-jr-v-state-texapp-2014.