Jeffrey Ray Vaughan v. Raul Medina, Pierre Newkirk, and Law Office of Raul Medina, P.C.
This text of Jeffrey Ray Vaughan v. Raul Medina, Pierre Newkirk, and Law Office of Raul Medina, P.C. (Jeffrey Ray Vaughan v. Raul Medina, Pierre Newkirk, and Law Office of Raul Medina, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-23-00017-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
JEFFREY RAY VAUGHAN, Appellant,
v.
RAUL MEDINA, PIERRE NEWKIRK, AND LAW OFFICE OF RAUL MEDINA, P.C., Appellees.
On appeal from the 430th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.
ORDER
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Silva Order Per Curiam
On January 13, 2023, appellant Jeffrey Ray Vaughan filed an emergency motion
for stay pending appeal pursuant to Rule 10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
See generally TEX. R. APP. P. 10. This Court requested appellees, Raul Medina, Pierre
Newkirk, and Law Office of Raul Medina, P.C., to file a response to this motion on or before 3:00 p.m. on Monday, January 16, 2023. The Court has now received and
reviewed appellees’ response.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the emergency motion for stay
and the response filed by appellees, is of the opinion that the appellant’s emergency
motion for stay should be denied. Accordingly, we deny appellant’s emergency motion for
stay pending appeal.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed on the 17th day of January, 2023.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jeffrey Ray Vaughan v. Raul Medina, Pierre Newkirk, and Law Office of Raul Medina, P.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffrey-ray-vaughan-v-raul-medina-pierre-newkirk-and-law-office-of-raul-texapp-2023.