Jeffrey Moses Hill v. Carolyn v. Rickards, Warden United States Parole Commission

Fourth Circuit

Jeffrey Moses Hill v. Carolyn v. Rickards, Warden United States Parole Commission

45 F.3d 426, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5835, 1995 WL 3687

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 4, 1995

Docket94-6400

StatusPublished

This text of 45 F.3d 426 (Jeffrey Moses Hill v. Carolyn v. Rickards, Warden United States Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jeffrey Moses Hill v. Carolyn v. Rickards, Warden United States Parole Commission, 45 F.3d 426, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5835, 1995 WL 3687 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

45 F.3d 426
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Jeffrey Moses HILL, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Carolyn V. RICKARDS, Warden; United States Parole
Commission, Respondents Appellees.

No. 94-6400.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 8, 1994.
Decided Jan. 4, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-93-85-3)

Jeffrey Moses Hill, appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Richmond, VA, for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hill v. Rickards, No. CA-93-85-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

45 F.3d 426
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Jeffrey Moses HILL, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Carolyn V. RICKARDS, Warden; United States Parole
Commission, Respondents Appellees.

No. 94-6400.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 8, 1994.
Decided Jan. 4, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-93-85-3)

Jeffrey Moses Hill, appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Richmond, VA, for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hill v. Rickards, No. CA-93-85-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 F.3d 426, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5835, 1995 WL 3687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffrey-moses-hill-v-carolyn-v-rickards-warden-uni-ca4-1995.