Jeffrey M Rupersburg v. Etkin Skanska Construction Co
This text of Jeffrey M Rupersburg v. Etkin Skanska Construction Co (Jeffrey M Rupersburg v. Etkin Skanska Construction Co) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
March 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132921 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan JEFFREY M. RUPERSBURG, Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman, Justices v SC: 132921 COA: 262470 ETKIN SKANSKA CONSTRUCTION Oakland CC: 2000-023553-NO COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, f/k/a A.J. ETKIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, and BAKER CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC., Defendants-Appellants,
and
WHALEY STEEL CORPORATION and L.W.
CONNELLY & SON, INC.,
Defendants.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 30, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 26, 2007 _________________________________________ t0319 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jeffrey M Rupersburg v. Etkin Skanska Construction Co, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffrey-m-rupersburg-v-etkin-skanska-construction--mich-2007.