Jeffrey M. Paull v. Chrysler Credit Corporation, and Fireside Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.
This text of 705 F.2d 944 (Jeffrey M. Paull v. Chrysler Credit Corporation, and Fireside Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff-appellant, Jeffrey M. Pauli, brought this action on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, alleging that defendants-appellees, Chrysler Credit Corporation and Fireside Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., violated the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1631 and 1638, and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder, by failing to properly disclose certain items in a retail installment contract Pauli signed in connection with his purchase of an automobile from Fireside. The district court granted the defendants’ motions for summary judgment in a well considered memorandum opinion and order, reported at 544 F.Supp. 848 (N.D.Ill.E.D.1982). We are persuaded that the district court’s judgment is correct. We adopt Judge Aspen’s opinion and affirm the order and entry of judgment granting the motions for summary judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
705 F.2d 944, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffrey-m-paull-v-chrysler-credit-corporation-and-fireside-ca7-1983.