Jeffrey M. Paull v. Chrysler Credit Corporation, and Fireside Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.

705 F.2d 944, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28303
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided May 3, 1983·No. 82-2478·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff-appellant, Jeffrey M. Pauli, brought this action on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, alleging that defendants-appellees, Chrysler Credit Corporation and Fireside Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., violated the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1631 and 1638, and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder, by failing to properly disclose certain items in a retail installment contract Pauli signed in connection with his purchase of an automobile from Fireside. The district court granted the defendants’ motions for summary judgment in a well considered memorandum opinion and order, reported at 544 F.Supp. 848 (N.D.Ill.E.D.1982). We are persuaded that the district court’s judgment is correct. We adopt Judge Aspen’s opinion and affirm the order and entry of judgment granting the motions for summary judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jeffrey M. Paull v. Chrysler Credit Corporation, and Fireside Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 705 F.2d 944, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28303 (7th Cir. 1983).

705 F.2d 944 (Jeffrey M. Paull v. Chrysler Credit Corporation, and Fireside Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shields v. Lefta, Inc.
888 F. Supp. 894 (N.D. Illinois, 1995)