Jeffrey M. Lorence v. Morequity, Inc. and Peak Foreclosure Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Jeffrey M. Lorence v. Morequity, Inc. and Peak Foreclosure Services, Inc.

DecidedJuly 7, 2015

Docket14-15-00177-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Jeffrey M. Lorence v. Morequity, Inc. and Peak Foreclosure Services, Inc. (Jeffrey M. Lorence v. Morequity, Inc. and Peak Foreclosure Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jeffrey M. Lorence v. Morequity, Inc. and Peak Foreclosure Services, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Order filed July 7, 2015

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-15-00177-CV ____________

JEFFREY M. LORENCE, Appellant

V.

MOREQUITY, INC. AND PEAK FORECLOSURE SERVICES, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 164th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-77187

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was filed on May 11, 2015. The court has determined that appellant has not properly presented this cause in the brief on file. Appellant failed to substantially comply with Rule 38 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. In particular, appellant has failed to provide “clear and concise argument for the contentions made, with appropriate citations to authorities and to the record.” Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(i). Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 38.9, the court orders appellant to rebrief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9. Appellant’s amended brief is due within 30 days of the date of this order and appellee’s responsive brief shall be due 30 days after appellant’s revised brief is filed. If appellant fails to file his brief within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown and Wise.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order filed July 7, 2015

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-15-00177-CV ____________

JEFFREY M. LORENCE, Appellant

V.

MOREQUITY, INC. AND PEAK FORECLOSURE SERVICES, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 164th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-77187

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was filed on May 11, 2015. The court has determined that appellant has not properly presented this cause in the brief on file. Appellant failed to substantially comply with Rule 38 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. In particular, appellant has failed to provide “clear and concise argument for the contentions made, with appropriate citations to authorities and to the record.” Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(i). Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 38.9, the court orders appellant to rebrief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9. Appellant’s amended brief is due within 30 days of the date of this order and appellee’s responsive brief shall be due 30 days after appellant’s revised brief is filed. If appellant fails to file his brief within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown and Wise.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Jeffrey M. Lorence v. Morequity, Inc. and Peak Foreclosure Services, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffrey-m-lorence-v-morequity-inc-and-peak-foreclo-texapp-2015.