JEFFREY LAGRANDEUR v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 16, 2022·No. 21-2217·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed March 16, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D21-2217

Lower Tribunal No. F17-9386

Jeffrey Lagrandeur,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marisa Tinkler Mendez, Judge.

Jeffrey Lagrandeur, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael W. Mervine, Bureau Chief, and Brian H. Zack, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and EMAS and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Anderson v. State, 627 So. 2d 1170, 1171 (Fla. 1993) (“To support summary denial without a hearing, a trial court must either state its rationale in its decision or attach those specific parts of the record that refute each claim presented in the motion.”); Sanders v. State, 946 So. 2d 953, 956 (Fla. 2006) (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984) ("First, the defendant must show that counsel's performance was deficient. . . . Second, the defendant must show that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense.").

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JEFFREY LAGRANDEUR v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

JEFFREY LAGRANDEUR v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (JEFFREY LAGRANDEUR v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Anderson v. State
627 So. 2d 1170 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Sanders v. State
946 So. 2d 953 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)