Jeffrey Krise v. State

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 9, 2018
Docket5D17-2809
StatusPublished

This text of Jeffrey Krise v. State (Jeffrey Krise v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jeffrey Krise v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JEFFREY KRISE,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-2809

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed April 13, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Marlene M. Alva, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kristen D. Dukes, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Reinpold, 824 N.W.2d 713, 723 (Neb. 2013) (holding

that although the State must “make the judgment as to whether to present expert

testimony regarding the age of actors in alleged child pornography, it is a question of fact

for the jury to decide whether the actors in alleged child pornography are under the age of 18” and noting that the “State may indeed risk losing the case by not presenting expert

testimony regarding such, but ultimately, it is for the jury to decide, with or without an

expert’s opinion, whether the evidence exhibits child pornography”).

LAMBERT, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jeffrey Krise v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffrey-krise-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.