Jeffrey Krise v. State
This text of Jeffrey Krise v. State (Jeffrey Krise v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
JEFFREY KRISE,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D17-2809
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed April 13, 2018
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Marlene M. Alva, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kristen D. Dukes, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See State v. Reinpold, 824 N.W.2d 713, 723 (Neb. 2013) (holding
that although the State must “make the judgment as to whether to present expert
testimony regarding the age of actors in alleged child pornography, it is a question of fact
for the jury to decide whether the actors in alleged child pornography are under the age of 18” and noting that the “State may indeed risk losing the case by not presenting expert
testimony regarding such, but ultimately, it is for the jury to decide, with or without an
expert’s opinion, whether the evidence exhibits child pornography”).
LAMBERT, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jeffrey Krise v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffrey-krise-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.