Jeffrey K. Malone v. Orbital ATK, Inc.

CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 11, 2020
Docket19-0815
StatusPublished

This text of Jeffrey K. Malone v. Orbital ATK, Inc. (Jeffrey K. Malone v. Orbital ATK, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jeffrey K. Malone v. Orbital ATK, Inc., (W. Va. 2020).

Opinion

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA

SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

JEFFREY K. MALONE, FILED Claimant Below, Petitioner December 11, 2020 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK

vs.) No. 19-0815 (BOR Appeal No. 2053963) SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA (Claim No. 2015010663)

ORBITAL ATK, INC., Employer Below, Respondent

MEMORANDUM DECISION Petitioner Jeffrey K. Malone, by Counsel J. Robert Weaver, appeals the decision of the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review (“Board of Review”). Orbital ATK, Inc., by Counsel Alyssa A. Sloan, filed a timely response.

The issue on appeal is additional compensable conditions. The claims administrator denied a request to add cervical spinal stenosis, lumbar spinal stenosis, left shoulder impingement, and bilateral knee arthritis to the claim on March 15, 2018. On April 25, 2018, it denied a request to add cervicalgia, cervical radiculopathy, occipital neuralgia, and left upper limb neuropathy to the claim. The Workers’ Compensation Office of Judges (“Office of Judges”) affirmed the decisions in its February 4, 2019, Order, with the exception of occipital neuralgia, which it added to the claim. 1 The Order was affirmed by the Board of Review on August 19, 2019.

The Court has carefully reviewed the records, written arguments, and appendices contained in the briefs, and the case is mature for consideration. The facts and legal arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record presented, the Court finds no substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these reasons, a memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Mr. Malone, a composite specialist, was injured in the course of his employment when he struck his head on a rail on August 18, 2014. In an August 20, 2014, treatment note, James Deren, M.D., noted that Mr. Malone was treated for a head contusion with no loss of consciousness. He reported headaches and ear ringing. Dr. Deren diagnosed acute head contusion with post-

1 The addition of occipital neuralgia to the claim was not appealed. 1 concussion headache. Mr. Malone’s symptoms were mild and slowly improving. He was released to return to full duty work.

August 21, 2014, treatment notes from Western Maryland Regional Medical Center indicate Mr. Malone was seen for a persistent headache for the previous four days, following a work-related head injury. He reported ringing in his ears, stiff neck, dizziness, and an odd feeling in his right arm. Mr. Malone was diagnosed with closed head injury and post-concussive syndrome. Mr. Malone sought treatment from Dr. Deren on October 22, 2014, for right neck/trapezius pain, shoulder pain, tinnitus, and headaches. He reported prior tinnitus in 1982. Dr. Deren noted good cervical range of motion and diagnosed right ear tinnitus, improved headaches, and neck pain.

On October 30, 2014, Augusto Figueroa Jr., M.D., saw Mr. Malone. He noted minor neck pain before the injury, but Mr. Malone denied any significant symptoms prior to his compensable injury. Dr. Figueroa found no concrete signs of radiculopathy, myelopathy, or peripheral neuropathy. He opined that the compensable injury most likely caused a strain. He recommended x-rays, which ultimately revealed cervical spondylosis. That same day, Dr. Figueroa wrote a letter to the claims administrator opining that Mr. Malone’s complaints were related to the compensable injury, and his neck symptoms would affect his work due to range of motion restriction.

Mr. Malone underwent physical therapy. A treatment note on November 17, 2014, indicates a diagnosis of cervicalgia. Mr. Malone denied any numbness or tingling in the left arm and reported improvement following therapy. By December 5, 2014, Mr. Malone had excellent cervical range of motion and was discharged from therapy. In a December 10, 2014, letter to Dr. Deren, Dr. Figueroa stated that Mr. Malone’s neck pain was improved and that he could turn his head with no problem. He noted no apparent weakness in the extremities.

A January 27, 2015, treatment note from ATK Occupational Health indicates Mr. Malone’s headaches had resolved and his neck stiffness had improved. On May 15, 2015, Mr. Malone reported low back and bilateral leg pain. He also reported a recent fall at work. On May 28, 2015, he was seen for back pain after pulling on a five-hundred-pound cart. On June 6, 2015, Mr. Malone reported increased knee pain. He stated that a recent MRI showed a tear in the knee on July 21, 2015. On February 12, 2016, Mr. Malone reported difficulty turning his head to the side.

Mr. Malone returned to Dr. Figueroa on February 29, 2016, and reported that he had developed recurrent neck pain six months prior along with intermittent left arm numbness. He also reported low back pain and difficulty turning his head. On March 4, 2016, Dr. Deren noted that Mr. Malone had progressive left-sided cervical pain. Dr. Deren noted that a 2014 cervical MRI showed a C3-4 disc bulge but opined that the findings did not explain Mr. Malone’s current symptoms.

Mr. Malone began treating with Allison Evans-Wood, D.O., on March 4, 2016. She noted that he reported neck pain causing numbness in his arm and fingertips that started a month ago. Dr. Evans-Wood diagnosed cervical disc herniation with cord compression, peripheral neuropathy, and cervical pain. Cervical x-rays performed on March 9, 2016, showed spondylosis with no 2 evidence of disc space narrowing. On March 11, 2016, a cervical MRI showed small left paracentral spondylosis with disc herniation at C3-4. There was no spinal cord compression. It was noted that Mr. Malone had encroachment into the left neural foraminal which had been noted since 2014. A lumbar MRI showed stable, mild stenosis at L3-4 caused by facet arthropathy. There had been no significant changes since March of 2014.

Mr. Malone was referred to Brian Holmes, M.D., a neurosurgeon. On March 30, 2016, Dr. Holmes noted that Mr. Malone had full range of motion in his cervical spine. He also noted subjective complaints of left arm numbness but no hypoesthesia or weakness on examination. Regarding the lumbar spine, Dr. Holmes opined that the symptoms were likely resulting from L4- 5 stenosis with facet arthropathy. On April 27, 2016, it was noted that Mr. Malone saw slight symptom improvement after an L4-5 facet injection. He reported low back pain that radiated down the left leg. On June 15, 2016, Mr. Malone was seen by Dr. Holmes’s physician’s assistant. It was noted that he saw one week of symptom improvement following a cervical spine injection. Mr. Malone was diagnosed with neck pain. A repeat cervical injection and lumbar physical therapy were recommended.

ChuanFang Jin, M.D., performed an independent medical evaluation on June 30, 2016, in which she found that Mr. Malone’s symptoms gradually worsened over time. He did not have any numbness in the left arm until January of 2016. Dr. Jin diagnosed cervical whiplash injury, preexisting degenerative cervical disc disease, and left arm radiculitis secondary to degenerative disc disease. Dr. Jin opined that Mr. Malone’s current symptoms were not related to the compensable injury, but rather, resulted from preexisting degenerative disc disease. Dr. Jin opined that further treatment would not be necessary for the compensable injury and that Mr. Malone had reached maximum medical improvement.

Mr. Malone returned to Dr. Holmes’s office for follow-up of cervical, lumbar, and extremity pain with numbness and weakness on June 27, 2016. On examination, Mr. Malone had full cervical range of motion but diminished lumbar range of motion. He was diagnosed with neck pain and mild cervical disc degeneration. On August 31, 2016, Mr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jeffrey K. Malone v. Orbital ATK, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffrey-k-malone-v-orbital-atk-inc-wva-2020.