Jeffrey K. Caswell v. City of Bloomington
This text of 214 F. App'x 634 (Jeffrey K. Caswell v. City of Bloomington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jeffery K. Caswell, Victoria Caswell, and Russ Dreyer appeal the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in their action challenging a City of Bloomington zoning ordinance regulating the land use around a newly constructed runway at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Advantage Media, L.L.C. v. City of Eden Prairie, 456 F.3d 793, 798 (8th Cir.2006) (de novo standard of review), we agree with the district court’s well-reasoned opinion that, due to the lack of redressability, the appellants lack standing in this matter. See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992) (to establish standing, plaintiff must demonstrate, inter alia, the likelihood that a favorable decision by the court will redress the alleged injury); Planned Parenthood of Mid-Mo. & E. Kan., Inc. v. Ehlmann, 137 F.3d 573, 577 (8th Cir.1998) (to establish redressability, plaintiff must make more than “merely speculative” showing that court can grant relief to injury).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 F. App'x 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffrey-k-caswell-v-city-of-bloomington-ca8-2007.