Jeffrey Hatton v. Commanding General, Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center, Infantry and Fort Polk, Fort Polk, Louisiana, No. 71-1268 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

447 F.2d 1401
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 1, 1971
Docket1401
StatusPublished

This text of 447 F.2d 1401 (Jeffrey Hatton v. Commanding General, Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center, Infantry and Fort Polk, Fort Polk, Louisiana, No. 71-1268 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jeffrey Hatton v. Commanding General, Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center, Infantry and Fort Polk, Fort Polk, Louisiana, No. 71-1268 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I, 447 F.2d 1401 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

447 F.2d 1401

Jeffrey HATTON, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
COMMANDING GENERAL, Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center,
Infantry and Fort Polk, Fort Polk, Louisiana,
Respondent-Appellant.
No. 71-1268 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431
F.2d 409, Part I.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 1, 1971.

Donald E. Walter, U.S. Atty., R. Perry Pringle, Asst. U.S. Atty., Shreveport, La., for respondent-appellant.

James J. Cox, Cox & Cox, Lake Charles, La., for petitioner-appellee.

Before WISDOM, COLEMAN, and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After an examination of the entire record, the District Court, in an unpublished memorandum opinion by Judge Hunter, held that there was no basis in fact for an Army finding of insincerity as to the conscientious objector claims of Jeffrey Hatton, the appellee, who was seeking a discharge.

Our examination of the same record leaves us in complete agreement with the District Court. Its judgment, granting Hatton's petition for the writ of habeas corpus, is accordingly

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
447 F.2d 1401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffrey-hatton-v-commanding-general-headquarters-us-army-training-ca5-1971.