Jeffrey Don Dooley v. the State of Texas
This text of Jeffrey Don Dooley v. the State of Texas (Jeffrey Don Dooley v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-24-00375-CR
JEFFREY DON DOOLEY, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 485th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1780925, Honorable Steve Jumes, Presiding
February 14, 2025 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.
Appellant, Jeffrey Don Dooley, appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated 1
and sentence to ten years of confinement, suspended in favor of community supervision
for five years. 2 Appellant’s brief was originally due January 15, 2025, but was not filed.
By letter of January 22, 2025, we admonished Appellant’s counsel that failure to file a
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 49.09(b).
2 Originally appealed to the Second Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by
the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. brief by February 3 would result in the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to
the trial court for further proceedings without further notice. To date, Appellant’s counsel
has neither filed a brief nor had any further communication with this Court.
Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall
determine the following:
1. whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;
2. whether Appellant is indigent;
3. if Appellant is not indigent, whether Appellant has made the necessary arrangements for filing a brief;
4. whether Appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal;
5. whether Appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel; and
6. the date the Court may expect Appellant’s brief to be filed.
The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by March 3, 2025.
If it is determined that Appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and has
been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint new counsel;
the name, address, email address, phone number, and state bar number of any newly
appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.
Should Appellant’s counsel file a brief on or before February 21, 2025, he is
directed to immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial
court shall not be required to take any further action.
2 It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jeffrey Don Dooley v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffrey-don-dooley-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.