Jeffrey Dano v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 27, 2017
Docket05-17-00219-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jeffrey Dano v. State (Jeffrey Dano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jeffrey Dano v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed April 27, 2017.

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00219-CR

JEFFREY DANO, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 004-84693-2016

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Fillmore, Whitehill, and Boatright Opinion by Justice Fillmore Jeffrey Dano was charged with possession of two ounces or less of marijuana. TEX.

HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.121(a), (b)(1) (West 2010). On January 31, 2017, after the

jury found Dano guilty, the trial court assessed punishment at thirty days’ confinement in county

jail, probated for twelve months, and a $200 fine. Dano filed a motion for new trial on February

20, 2017. TEX. R. APP. P. 21.4(a) (motion for new trial due within 30 days of date sentence

imposed or suspended in open court). The trial court granted Dano’s motion for new trial by

written order dated March 30, 2017. TEX. R. APP. P. 21.8(a), (b) (trial court order granting

motion for new trial must be written and entered within 75 days of date sentence imposed or

suspended in open court).

An order granting a motion for new trial restores the case to its posture prior to trial, and

the judgment is no longer in place to appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 21.9(b); Waller v. State, 931 S.W.2d 640, 643–44 (Tex. App.–Dallas 1996, no pet.). Absent a judgment of conviction or other

appealable order, there is nothing before the Court over which we have jurisdiction. See Wright

v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.–Dallas 1998, no pet.).

We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

/Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)

170219F.U05

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

JEFFREY DANO, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Collin County, Texas, No. 05-17-00219-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. 004-84693-2016. Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Whitehill and Boatright participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 27th day of April, 2017.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. State
969 S.W.2d 588 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Waller v. State
931 S.W.2d 640 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jeffrey Dano v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffrey-dano-v-state-texapp-2017.