Jeffrey Cohen v. Rod Rosenstein

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6193

JEFFREY COHEN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ROD ROSENSTEIN, US Attorney; HARRY GRUBER, Asst. US Attorney; JOYCE MCDONALD, Asst. US Attorney,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:15-cv-00263-WDQ)

Submitted: May 19, 2015 Decided: May 22, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey Brian Cohen, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Brian Cohen appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice 1 his civil complaint against federal

prosecutors as premature 2 under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915, 1915A (2012).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Cohen v. Rosenstein, No. 1:15-cv-00263-WDQ (D. Md. Feb.

3, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

1 We have jurisdiction because Cohen cannot cure the defect identified in his complaint by mere amendment. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). 2 See Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641, 646 (1997); Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994).