Jeffery v. American Federation of Labor

127 A. 462, 282 Pa. 123, 1925 Pa. LEXIS 580
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 1, 1924·No. Appeal, 80·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

A judgment against defendants for want of an affidavit of defense was stricken off, and this appeal followed.

We have read with care plaintiff’s statement of claim, covering eighteen printed pages, and agree with the court below that, while the summons issued in assumpsit, the action sounds in tort. Of the 35 charging paragraphs, the few that show any elements of contract would not support a judgment by default. One cannot, by calling an action in tort assumpsit, entitle himself to judgment for want of an affidavit of defense: Corry v. Pa. R. R. Co., 194 Pa. 516; Parry v. First N. Bank, 270 Pa. 556, 562.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jeffery v. American Federation of Labor, 127 A. 462, 282 Pa. 123, 1925 Pa. LEXIS 580 (Pa. 1924).

127 A. 462 (Jeffery v. American Federation of Labor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lindsley v. First National Bank
190 A. 876 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Stamp v. Union Stevedoring Corp.
11 F.2d 172 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1925)