Jeffery Tyler Lane v. Greensville Correctional Center Medical Staff E. M. Grizzard, Warden H. R. Powell, Assistant Warden Barnes

962 F.2d 7, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17270, 1992 WL 107446
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 21, 1992
Docket92-6379
StatusUnpublished

This text of 962 F.2d 7 (Jeffery Tyler Lane v. Greensville Correctional Center Medical Staff E. M. Grizzard, Warden H. R. Powell, Assistant Warden Barnes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jeffery Tyler Lane v. Greensville Correctional Center Medical Staff E. M. Grizzard, Warden H. R. Powell, Assistant Warden Barnes, 962 F.2d 7, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17270, 1992 WL 107446 (4th Cir. 1992).

Opinion

962 F.2d 7

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jeffery Tyler LANE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GREENSVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER MEDICAL STAFF; E. M.
Grizzard, Warden; H. R. Powell, Assistant Warden;
Barnes, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6379.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 4, 1992
Decided: May 21, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-91-767-3)

Jeffery Tyler Lane, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Jeffery Tyler Lane filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation, dismissed the case without prejudice when Plaintiff failed to comply with the fee order. Plaintiff appeals. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Evans v. Croom
650 F.2d 521 (Fourth Circuit, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
962 F.2d 7, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17270, 1992 WL 107446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffery-tyler-lane-v-greensville-correctional-cent-ca4-1992.