Jeffery H. v. New York State Office of Children & Family Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jeffery H. v. New York State Office of Children & Family Services

266 A.D.2d 544, 698 N.Y.S.2d 914, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12314

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 29, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 266 A.D.2d 544 (Jeffery H. v. New York State Office of Children & Family Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jeffery H. v. New York State Office of Children & Family Services, 266 A.D.2d 544, 698 N.Y.S.2d 914, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12314 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family [545]*545Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of the Family-Court, Nassau County (Medowar, J.), dated October 7, 1998, which, after a hearing, extended the appellant’s placement with the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from an order which extended the appellant’s placement is academic, as the period of placement has expired (see, Matter of Sammy C., 254 AD2d 415; Matter of C. Children, 252 AD2d 524; Matter of Carlos S., 243 AD2d 569). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family [545]*545Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of the Family-Court, Nassau County (Medowar, J.), dated October 7, 1998, which, after a hearing, extended the appellant’s placement with the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from an order which extended the appellant’s placement is academic, as the period of placement has expired (see, Matter of Sammy C., 254 AD2d 415; Matter of C. Children, 252 AD2d 524; Matter of Carlos S., 243 AD2d 569). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D.2d 544, 698 N.Y.S.2d 914, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffery-h-v-new-york-state-office-of-children-family-services-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack