Jeffery Clayton Hood v. State of Florida
This text of Jeffery Clayton Hood v. State of Florida (Jeffery Clayton Hood v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 5D2024-1296 LT Case No. 2022-CF-001361-A _____________________________
JEFFERY CLAYTON HOOD,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County. Stephen E. Toner, Jr., Judge.
Matthew Metz, Public Defender, and Judson Searcy, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
February 21, 2025
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence but remand for the trial court to strike two of the four
1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). costs imposed pursuant to section 938.085, Florida Statutes (2022).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED with INSTRUCTIONS.
EDWARDS, C.J., and MAKAR and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jeffery Clayton Hood v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffery-clayton-hood-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.