Jeffery A. Wells v. Anthony J. Principi
Opinions
ORDER
On November 3, 2003, the appellant, through counsel, filed a motion for an initial decision by the full Court. He argues that full-Court consideration is necessary because the appeal presents the opportunity to consider all aspects of the amendments to the Veterans Benefits Act of 2002, Pub.L. No. 107-330, 116 Stat. 2820 (2002).
Motions for a full-Court decision are not favored. Ordinarily they will not be granted unless such action is necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the Court’s decisions or to resolve a question of exceptional importance. See U.S. Vet.App. R. 35(c). In this matter, the appellant has not shown that either basis exists to warrant a full-Court decision.
Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
[34]*34ORDERED that the appellant’s motion for an initial decision by the full Court is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
18 Vet. App. 33 (Jeffery A. Wells v. Anthony J. Principi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.