Jeffery A. Wells v. Anthony J. Principi
This text of 18 Vet. App. 33 (Jeffery A. Wells v. Anthony J. Principi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
On November 3, 2003, the appellant, through counsel, filed a motion for an initial decision by the full Court. He argues that full-Court consideration is necessary because the appeal presents the opportunity to consider all aspects of the amendments to the Veterans Benefits Act of 2002, Pub.L. No. 107-330, 116 Stat. 2820 (2002).
Motions for a full-Court decision are not favored. Ordinarily they will not be granted unless such action is necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the Court’s decisions or to resolve a question of exceptional importance. See U.S. Vet.App. R. 35(c). In this matter, the appellant has not shown that either basis exists to warrant a full-Court decision.
Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
[34]*34ORDERED that the appellant’s motion for an initial decision by the full Court is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 Vet. App. 33, 2004 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 270, 2004 WL 1053160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeffery-a-wells-v-anthony-j-principi-cavc-2004.