Jefferson v. Wendt
51 Cal. 573
Opinion
The court below held that the Statute of Limitations had operated a bar to the plaintiff’s claim. This was put upon the ground that in 1865 or 18.66 there was a delivery of the sheriff’s deed to the plaintiff. But it is apparent that no deed was delivered to the plaintiff until June, 1873, and the action was commenced in 1874. .
Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial. Remittitur forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jefferson v. Wendt, 51 Cal. 573 (Cal. 1877).
51 Cal. 573 (Jefferson v. Wendt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sevier v. Locher
222 Cal. App. 3d 1082 (California Court of Appeal, 1990)
Lawrence v. Maloof
256 Cal. App. 2d 600 (California Court of Appeal, 1967)
Laubisch v. Roberdo
277 P.2d 9 (California Supreme Court, 1954)
Marion Investment Co. v. Virginia Lincoln Furniture Corp.
198 S.E. 508 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1938)
Comstock v. Finn
56 P.2d 957 (California Court of Appeal, 1936)
Transmarine Corp. v. R. W. Kinney Co.
11 P.2d 877 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)
Dobbins v. Economic Gas Co.
189 P. 1073 (California Supreme Court, 1920)
Robinson v. Thornton
31 P. 936 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
Leonard v. Flynn
26 P. 1097 (California Supreme Court, 1891)
Barroilhet v. Anspacher
8 P. 804 (California Supreme Court, 1885)