Jefferson v. State
This text of 61 S.E. 997 (Jefferson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where an excerpt from a charge of the court is excepted to generally, without indicating any. specific defect, and the charge in the abstract is correct, this court will not undertake to examine the record to see whether the excerpt is properly adjusted to the facts of the case; nor will the giving in charge of such excerpt be held to be erroneous. See, in this connection, Anderson v. Southern Ry. Co., 107 Ga. 500 (33 S. E. 644) ; O’Neal v. O’Neal, 112 Ga. 348 (37 S. E. 375); Roberts v. State, 114 Ga. 450 (40 S. E. 297) ; Owens v. State, 120 Ga. 209 (2), (47 S. E. 545) ; Georgia, Fla. & Ala. Ry. Co. v. Lasseter, 122 Ga. 680 (6), (51 S. E. 15).
2. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no error in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 S.E. 997, 131 Ga. 28, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jefferson-v-state-ga-1908.